RH predicate (abstract): all nontrivial zeros lie on Re s = 1/2. At this phase, we keep it as a single Prop to be connected with the ζ API later.
Equations
Instances For
Preparedness conditions for a golden-lattice test sequence. This bundles the assumptions coming from plan2: frame bounds, Γ-収束, and Gaussian width control. Each field is a Prop placeholder to keep the API light.
Instances For
Frourio–Weil criterion at height σ: for every prepared golden test sequence, each element has nonnegative ζ-quadratic energy, and if it is zero then the Mellin trace vanishes at ζ zeros with the prescribed multiplicity.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Auxiliary: discrete–continuous consistency of Qζ along prepared golden sequences.
Equations
- Frourio.disc_consistency _σ _F = True
Instances For
Auxiliary: kernel–multiplicity bridge specialized to elements of a prepared sequence.
Equations
Instances For
Auxiliary: contradiction derived from an off-critical zero using the prepared toolkit.
Equations
Instances For
Concentration at τ₀
along a golden test sequence: the Mellin trace mass
outside any fixed neighborhood of τ₀
goes to zero.
Equations
Instances For
Standard golden test sequence with δ n = 1/(n+1)
- hδ_lim : Filter.Tendsto self.δ Filter.atTop (nhds 0)
The width parameter has the standard form
Instances For
Auxiliary: existence of a golden-lattice peak sequence concentrating at a target zero.
Equations
- Frourio.exists_golden_peak σ = ∀ (τ₀ : ℝ), ∃ (F : Frourio.GoldenTestSeq σ), Frourio.concentrates_at σ F τ₀
Instances For
The limiting_energy is non-negative for elements in our construction
Predicate for Γ-convergence of a sequence of functionals to a limit functional. For golden sequences, we track convergence of the energy functionals.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Phase 3.2: Discrete–continuous consistency along prepared golden sequences
(statement-level). With current placeholders for bounds and Γ-収束, we record
the result as a direct proof of the Prop
scaffold.
(ii) ⇒ (i): From the Frourio–Weil criterion at height σ, conclude RH. At this phase, RH is an abstract predicate and the bridge lemmas are recorded as propositional placeholders to be instantiated in later phases.
(i) ⇒ (ii): Assuming RH, every prepared golden test sequence satisfies the
Frourio–Weil criterion. In this phase, nonnegativity comes from Qζσ_pos
and
the vanishing implication comes from the multiplicity bridge placeholder.